Architecture Professor Works to Keep History Afloat in Cairo

For most people, leaky pipes mean calling a plumber and then their insurance agent, and not necessarily in that order. But in Cairo, so much water is flowing from leaky pipes that it’s causing 1,000-year-old mosques and other historic sites to sink.

Enter Brook Muller, an architecture professor in the UO’s School of Architecture and Allied Arts. He and several colleagues from around the world put their heads together when they heard about the sinking mosques — some dating from the 11th to 13th centuries — and started working on a plan. With the diversion of water, they could not only potentially save the mosques but also create a green space that could revitalize two neighborhoods that had seen better days.

Muller, a specialist in ecological infrastructure and water-centric design, thinks cleaning and diverting the water could transform a state-owned, 10,000-square-foot strip of land — now a garbage dump — into the heart of a thriving, community-based neighborhood.

The project began to take shape when Muller was invited to a workshop in Cairo and met May al-Ibrashy, a historic preservationist. Al-Ibrashy was talking about the Ibn Tulun Mosque, the oldest and largest in the city, completed in 879 A.D. and big enough to hold up as many as 30,000 worshippers.

She had been restoring several shrines in the Al Khalifa neighborhood near Ibn Tulun, but over time most of them had slipped below grade as the city built up around them over the centuries. As a result, historic holy sites, including the 12th and 13th century Al-Ashraf Khalil and Fatima Khatun domes, were sinking and becoming damaged because near-surface bedrock gave water leaking from pipes no place to go.

To save the mosques and domes, excess water would need to be pumped out. But the water itself is not potable. It smells and is actually gray, most likely full of pollutants.

Intercepting it only to channel it to the sewer system was not a solution, as it would only send the problems downstream. Instead, through extraction, treatment and storage, it could be put to productive use.

The solution came in the form of a narrow strip of abandoned land situated between the Zaynhum and al-Kalifa neighborhoods, a site routinely used as a dumping ground and a place for illicit activity after dark.

The water could be rerouted to that space, feeding gardens that would serve as a “green lung” to help filter the heavy pollution that lays over the city. It would turn an eyesore into a thriving, beneficial space for both neighborhoods.

Al-Ibrashy partnered with Kareem Ibrahim, an urban development consultant who had been working on housing for Syrian refugees on the outskirts of Cairo. Muller contacted water engineer Meg Prior and environmental educator and project ecologist Josh Cerra, an assistant professor of landscape architecture and director of undergraduate studies at Cornell University, both of whom Muller had worked with before.

The team, aided by small grants from the U.S. Embassy, the American Research Center in Egypt, the Egyptian Ministry of Antiquities and the Cairo Governorate, chose an approach that may seem obvious but is often overlooked: They talked to the communities on both sides of the potential park about what they wanted to see it evolve into and what the needs of each community were.

The result was an engagement between the project and the residents that not only provided several solutions and options but also strengthened community bonds.

Continue reading the full story here.

Originally posted by Laurie Notaro, University of Oregon Communications, May 22, 2017,

The Biggest Lawsuit on the Planet: Juliana v. US moves forward | UO

On November 10th, 2016, the United States District Court Judge Ann Aiken ruled that the climate change lawsuit brought by 21 youth plaintiffs can proceed. Judge Aiken’s opinion states: “This action is of a different order than the typical environmental case. It alleges that the deefendants’ actions and inactions–whether or not they violate any specific statutory duty–have so profoundly damaged our home planet that they threaten plaintiffs’ fundamental constitutional rights to life and liberty.”

The opinion cites publications by Professor Mary Wood, faculty director of the Environmental and Natural Resources Law Center (ENR) at Oregon Law and a leading expert in the public trust doctrine. The doctrine fosters the idea that natural resources are held in trust by the government and that the government must manage them responsibly in order to ensure continued use by future generations. Wood’s cited book Nature’s Trust: Environmental Law for a New Ecological Age, published in 2014, asserts that in addition to public lands, wildlife, and water, the atmosphere is a resource held in trust by the government. The opinion also cites the work of former ENR Center fellow Nathan Bellinger (’14) and Professor Gerald Torres of Cornell Law School.

Continue reading here.

Originally published by UO School of Law, ENR Center

Sustainable Cities Initiative: Current Research Theme 2015-2017 | UO

Framing Livability is the current SCI research theme for 2015-2017. Working with the UO School of Journalism and Communication’s (SoJC) faculty who specialize in strategic communication, a series of research projects, public presentations, and avenues of education have been created in order to delve into the concept of livability.

The concept of livability holds potential as a new means of framing and cultivating buy-in for complex development projects. It also presents a vague concept with multiple definitions that vary depending on the demographics of the audience and geographic location of the development project. Given its breadth, it is unclear what aspects of livability connect best with different populations, and which aspects would be most effective in eliciting public support.

By defining livability and establishing clear, concise metrics to explore new ways of communicating sustainable principles that emphasize public health and financial benefits in addition to environmental considerations, the work of SCI and SoJC seeks to answer how sustainability-focused community development efforts can be communicated in the most effective way to garner public support.

More information can be found here.

Originally published by Sustainable Cities Initiative, University of Oregon 

OREGON 2100: Projected Climatic and Ecological Changes | UO

The Environmental Change Research Group, run by the Department of Geography, addresses the variability of past climates and the biogeographic and ecosystem consequences of the variability, with implications for gauging threats of ongoing climate change, land use and population growth. In March 2016, a team of researchers, including Daniel G. Gavin, Associate Professor, Department of Geography, published a new report focusing on projected climatic and ecological changes for the state of Oregon. The report uses the CO2 projections for the year 2100 and gives quantitative future predictions for future climate, landscape, soils, vegetation, and marine and terrestrial animals of Oregon. You can read the whole report here.

Abstract

Greenhouse climatic warming is underway and exacerbated by human activities. Future outcomes of these processes can be projected using computer models checked against climatic changes during comparable past atmospheric compositions. This study gives concise quantitative predictions for future climate, landscape, soils, vegetation, and marine and terrestrial animals of Oregon. Fossil fuel burning and other human activities by the year 2100 are projected to yield atmospheric CO2 levels of about 600-850 ppm (SRES A1B and B1), well above current levels of 400 ppm and preindustrial levels of 280 ppm. Such a greenhouse climate was last recorded in Oregon during the middle Miocene, some 16 million years ago. Oregon’s future may be guided by fossil records of the middle Miocene, as well as ongoing studies on the environmental tolerances of Oregon plants and animals, and experiments on the biological effects of global warming. As carbon dioxide levels increase, Oregon’s climate will move toward warm temperate, humid in the west and semiarid to subhumid to the east, with increased summer and winter drought in the west. Western Oregon lowlands will become less suitable for temperate fruits and nuts and Pinot Noir grapes, but its hills will remain a productive softwood forest resource. improved pasture and winter wheat crops will become more widespread in eastern Oregon. Tsunamis and stronger storms will exacerbate marine erosion along the Oregon Coast, with significant damage to coastal properties and cultural resources.

Originally published by the Museum of Natural History, UO. March 2016, Bulletin No. 26

 

Research study probes how warming will affect carbon in soils | UO

Efforts by UO researchers to study how climate change may change Pacific Northwest grasslands have blossomed into global collaborations with two recently published reports, and a third is coming.

The three studies focus on the ability of soils to continue to store excess carbon in the face of warming conditions. Students at individual research sites have produced mixed results, but the new findings may help to change the scientific understanding. The first study was led by Yale University and the second by the Marine Biological Laboratory at Wood Hole, Massachusetts.

Read the full story here.

 

Originally published by Jim Barlow, University of Oregon Communications, 12/01/2016